Blog 5 March 2024 minute read

Solvency II and Sustainability: The EU’s ESG Mandate for Insurance Companies

The EU is at the forefront of promoting sustainability and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles, urging insurance companies to incorporate these criteria into their operations and reporting to effectively address climate change. In this article, we will discuss the challenges associated with implementing these principles and navigating the evolving regulatory landscape.

Nihat Mammadli
Senior Consultant

Introduction to EU's Sustainability & ESG Focus

Amid growing concerns for the environment and a notable shift in societal values towards ethical business practices, the European Union (EU) has taken a leading role in advocating for sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles across different industries. Within the insurance sector, these priorities have triggered a significant reassessment of how companies report their activities, urging them to incorporate sustainability criteria into their day-to-day operations and reporting methods.

The EU’s emphasis on integrating sustainability and ESG reporting within insurance companies arises from recognizing the industry’s crucial function in managing risks and ensuring financial stability. Insurers, as central figures in risk assessment and mitigation, play a pivotal role in addressing issues like climate change, social inequality, and governance gaps. As a result, the EU has embarked on a comprehensive regulatory journey, instituting strict reporting requirements to ensure that insurers align their strategies with sustainable practices while openly disclosing their impacts on the environment, society, and governance. 

Evolution and Challenges Within the Sector

Navigating the complex landscape of sustainability, the insurance sector undergoes a transformative odyssey, aligning itself with the EU’s Solvency II framework. Solvency II, implemented in 2016, lays the groundwork by blending financial prudence with the art of risk management. However, this evolution prompts insurers to explore new territories, urging a more comprehensive integration of ESG principles. Amidst this evolution, regulatory directives unfold, addressing the undulating challenges of climate risks and sustainability imperatives. 

The Solvency II Directive, a comprehensive regulatory framework governing the EU insurance industry, extends beyond solvency requirements to encompass the realm of climate-related risks. It mandates robust risk management systems, acknowledging climate change as a significant risk demanding attention. Anchored within this framework is the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), requiring insurers to map their solvency needs and risk profiles, including a forward-looking assessment of climate-related perils.  

Yet, the narrative takes a pivotal turn as the EU sharpens its focus on sustainability and disclosures linked to climate considerations. Initiatives such as the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) interlace a complex thread into the regulatory fabric, subtly shaping insurers’ approaches to navigating and unveiling climate-related risks. This shift goes beyond mere regulatory compliance, urging insurers to transparently disclose the ESG factors, specifically concerning climate change, within their risk management and investment strategies. 

The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) emerges as a catalyst for change, recognizing the significance of sustainability and climate-related risks within the insurance sphere. EIOPA’s engagement in initiatives unravelling the complexities of climate risks underscores its advocacy for integrating ESG factors into robust risk management practices. This collaboration between regulatory frameworks and the industry’s pursuit of sustainability marks a transformative shift in approach. 

Implementation Challenges & Risk Models

Drawing from the latest EIOPA ‘Application guidance on running climate change materiality assessment and using climate change scenarios in the ORSA’ released on 02 August 2022, which underscores the critical role of considering climate change materiality and scenarios within the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA). EIOPA’s emphasis on these aspects further bolsters the importance of addressing climate risks within insurers’ risk assessment frameworks. 

However, the path towards compliance and effective implementation of these models presents numerous challenges for European insurance companies. From grappling with limited historical data essential for robust climate change modelling to crafting intricate correlations and causalities that reflect the unpredictable nature of climate events, companies face a daunting task. Adapting to a shifting regulatory landscape while deciphering the nuanced language of climate risks adds another layer of complexity. 

Furthermore, aligning investment strategies with climate-conscious approaches poses a financial balancing act, demanding strategic acumen. The integration of advanced technologies, a scarcity of skilled professionals, collaboration hurdles, and the task of communicating complex models to stakeholders amplify the intricacies of this process.  

Within the context of Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) and its consideration of climate-related risks, insurers often develop two specific models: transitional risk models and physical risk models.  

Transitional Risk Models focus on assessing and quantifying the financial impacts associated with transitioning to a low-carbon economy or significant changes in the environmental landscape. These models evaluate risks stemming from regulatory shifts, market dynamics, technological advancements, and shifts in consumer behaviour linked to a more sustainable, low-carbon future. 

They consider scenarios where regulations, policies, or market forces substantially change, impacting industries reliant on fossil fuels or contributing to high carbon emissions. By estimating potential financial exposures and vulnerabilities from transitioning to a more environmentally sustainable economy, these models facilitate insurers in assessing and preparing for various transition scenarios through simulations, stress testing, and scenario analysis. 

On the other hand, Physical Risk Models concentrate on assessing and quantifying the direct impacts of climate change-related events on insurers’ assets, liabilities, and operations. These models evaluate potential financial losses and operational disruptions arising from extreme weather events like floods, storms, wildfires, rising sea levels, temperature variations, and other climate-related phenomena. 

Employing advanced analyses using climate data, catastrophe modelling, and sophisticated tools, physical risk models simulate the potential impact of climate-related events on insurance portfolios, infrastructure, and business continuity. By quantifying potential losses and vulnerabilities, insurers gain insights into their exposure to physical risks associated with climate change, aiding them in formulating effective strategies for mitigation and management. 

Both transitional and physical risk models are crucial components of ORSA, enabling insurers to conduct comprehensive risk assessments that consider the evolving environmental landscape and its potential impact on their long-term financial sustainability and solvency. These models aid insurers in understanding and proactively managing the complex interplay between climate-related risks and their business operations, helping them make informed decisions and adapt to the changing environmental dynamics. 

Harmonizing Compliance, Innovation, and Resilience

In this symphony of regulatory compliance, technological innovation, and risk management, European insurance companies find themselves in a state of perpetual adaptation. The harmonization between regulatory mandates, industry resilience, and the pursuit of sustainability stands as the beacon guiding the sector towards a climate-conscious future. 

As RiskSphere, we pride ourselves on our extensive experience and expertise in the realms of sustainability and risk management. Our team comprises dedicated professionals well-versed in navigating the landscapes of climate-related risks. With a deep understanding of the data maze, modelling dilemmas, regulatory rigidity, risk riddles, and the expertise echelon required in this evolving landscape, we stand committed to assisting insurers in effectively managing and mitigating the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change. We offer tailored solutions and strategic guidance, leveraging our proficiency to empower insurance companies in embracing regulatory compliance, harnessing advanced modelling techniques, and fostering resilience in the face of complex risk environments. 

Read more

For a deeper dive into managing climate risks and unlocking the full potential of stress tests and scenario analysis, visit our Insights page. Read more and stay ahead in a changing world.

Reach out for tailored advice

With a solid grasp of both the uses and boundaries of climate risk stress tests and scenario analysis, you are more equipped to leverage their benefits. At RiskSphere, our commitment is to assist you in managing the intricacies of climate risk effectively.

Get in touch